 |
|
  |
 |
12-14-2004, 07:22 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Lightening a crank
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I've got an na engine sitting in the horizon at home that is currently busted, and thought about trying some stuff out. I basically want to make an autocross car out of it.
I want to be able to rev the crap out of it, so i'm going to go with the lightest engine assembly I can find. Lightweight rods, lightened or aluminum flywheel, and a lightened crank.
Now, here's the question. How successful would it be to drill out material from the rod journals and trim down the counterweights. Would this completely destroy the integrity of a cast crank. 100 hp isn't too big a load on it, so I think it is doable, I just want to know some oppinions. How much will weight dropped help to increase my rev limit.
Any thoughts or comments will be appreciated. This was just something I was thinking about on the way home today.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-14-2004, 07:33 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Drill out material from the rod jounals, and take the same amount of material off the counter weights.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-14-2004, 08:40 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Crown Point, IN
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by marcoze
Trimmin counterweights = No longer acting as counterweights. Very unbalanced.
|
  |
which is why you have to have it re-balanced....
I thought about *knife-edging* my crank but, it was too expensive for my taste and not that great on the heavier cars like the G and J bodies.. I think clickhere33 had his crank knife edged, might wanna give him a pm and ask him. The cast crank should easily handle being knife edged and should easily handle almost anything you could throw at it.. hell, some guys are using cast cranks and making over 350 horspower daily...
Bryan
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-18-2004, 11:04 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
I know of a guy that used to race circle track with our engines. He built a few engines that he hacked the counterweights in half then had the whole mess rebalanced....quite interesting. I almost did it myself, but the custom work the journals took long enough without ahveing to worry about that headache. What sucks is I have this nice crank, rods, and pistons all ready to go in this block....along with main cap studs ect., but I still need other stuff to make it all "right"...and now my "ubermotor" plans have completely taken a new direction....so these parts are now just sitting......arrrgghhhh!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-18-2004, 11:56 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wyandotte, michigan
My Ride: 90 stang, 86 stang
Engine: T.T521", nitrous351w
Induct: Turbo + Nitrous
1/4: 0.000
|
knife edging a crank on one of our motors is good for at least 20-15 h.p if used with a good pan and screen. Throw a dry sump and ull pick up 40 or more with the combo... no windage is more power
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-19-2004, 12:06 AM
|
#9
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
What is a dry sump oil system? It came up in the thread about the new Vette, and now.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-19-2004, 12:41 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA
1/4: 0.000
|
This should help. http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question331.htm There is also a write-up in the mopar performance book. Hope this helped.
Daniel
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-19-2004, 12:59 AM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Thanks for the link...sounds a little complicated for use on a junkyard car
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-19-2004, 01:18 AM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA
My Ride: '87 Omni
Engine: Dodge 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.320
|
Remember the weight that limits rpm is the rod/piston...thats what you have to start and stop all the time, and if you're really really going to turn a motor, start looking at rod angle ratios and maybe think about different pin height pistons and longer connecting rods with maybe an underground crank thats been offset... now we're talking $$$
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
12-19-2004, 02:21 AM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina
My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Yeah, its the longrod motor: 2.2 crank in a tall deck block while using the longer pre-CB 2.5 rods and milled 2.2 pistons.
It is definitley an option. Finding the talldeck blocks is becoming more difficult (or so I have heard).
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|