TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Block

Engine - Block Improving strength and durability - pistons to crank

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 12-17-2004, 10:45 PM   #1
Who's pushed the common block?  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sparta, WI

My Ride: '95 ZX-6R
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 138
Feedback: (0)
Ok, who's pushed the common block passed its limits? I'm not talking about the internals, I have that covered. I'm talking the block itself. Anyone have any breakage stories?
1badtgp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 10:47 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: scottsbluff, NE

My Ride: 85 GLH
Engine: 2.5CB
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 803
Feedback: (4)
broke my arm pushing one into the back of a truck.



ok, no sorry just kidding

haven't tried it
ZachT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 10:50 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mechanicsburg PA

My Ride: Voyager
Engine: 2.5 .040 over cast
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 581
Feedback: (0)
i think the guy with the 90 daytona, 16V hybrid cracked his.
myplasticegg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 08:45 AM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
Get a 90 and up common block. They added more "beef" to the rear of the block between the freeze plugs. It is noticibly beefier. Reeves had his block crack there all the way across at about the 375whp 425 ft lb mark.
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 10:55 AM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sparta, WI

My Ride: '95 ZX-6R
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 138
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by glhsken
Get a 90 and up common block. They added more "beef" to the rear of the block between the freeze plugs. It is noticibly beefier. Reeves had his block crack there all the way across at about the 375whp 425 ft lb mark.
I'm going to be using the original block from my '90 ES Turbo. This one should have that extra beef correct? Thanks for the response btw. Also, what did Reeves have for mods when he cracked the block, if anyone knows? Was it high boost related, Nitrous, or just couldn't handle the torque? Thanks everyone!
1badtgp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 11:07 AM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
Reeves was a 2.5L t3/4 50 trim ABM Header 3" s/v custom cal pushing 25psi. running mid 11's at 122-23mph. His torque Peaked right around 4 k violently.
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 01:55 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sparta, WI

My Ride: '95 ZX-6R
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 138
Feedback: (0)
So has he tried running the same setup on the new block yet? I will have a similar probelm with the turbo I'm running as well.
1badtgp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 04:53 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
LOL... yep.. 10.97 @ 129.5... 27-28 max boost. He's running "all of it". He's outrun the poor old 50 trim. His new block seems to be holding up fine. He's still looking for JUST a 90+ cb engine to swap the internals to. It's a riot when he shifts. 25" M&H's running 6psi air pressure. Man do those things shake when he shifts!!! That is the as dynoed 406whp 464 ft lb set-up.
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 06:59 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary CAN

My Ride: 88 Lancer Shelby
Engine: 4cyl. 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,290
Feedback: (0)
FFWD did. Too much side load on the back wall with 480whp on a 2.5.
LancerShelby is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 08:03 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: monessen pa

My Ride: 88 daytona pacifica
Engine: 2.2l t2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 112
Feedback: (0)
im just wonderin if anyones ever thought about the intermediate shaft bein bolted to the block. torque steerin 400 hp and havin a shaft bolted to the back of the block.
benner135 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2004, 08:10 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Don't know how but cracked my CB block, see sig for power. Right underneath the starter, a crack just above coolant jacket, aprox 10 inches long. Had it welded, too much money in it to throw it away. I am running the jack shaft set up also.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 02:44 AM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sparta, WI

My Ride: '95 ZX-6R
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 138
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by benner135
im just wonderin if anyones ever thought about the intermediate shaft bein bolted to the block. torque steerin 400 hp and havin a shaft bolted to the back of the block.

This brings up a really good point. I'm going to have to look at my car tomorrow to see if there is a way to fab something up.
1badtgp is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 09:25 AM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by benner135
im just wonderin if anyones ever thought about the intermediate shaft bein bolted to the block. torque steerin 400 hp and havin a shaft bolted to the back of the block.
That's funny!!! this thread got me thinking the exact same thing!!! Reeved DID switch to a HD LONG passenger axle somewhere in that time frame. Once you go above a level of hp, the int set-up really doesn't make a difference from his experience.
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 11:07 AM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: browntown, nj

My Ride: 84 rampage
Engine: 2.2L T3
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.850

Posts: 1,062
Feedback: (0)
i run the long axle and haven't had any complaints with torque-steer. the quaife really helps. I think the long axle is simpler, and has less parts to break, plus it makes more room underneath(i'm lazy).
Mike Radowski is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 12:07 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clickhere33
i run the long axle and haven't had any complaints with torque-steer. the quaife really helps. I think the long axle is simpler, and has less parts to break, plus it makes more room underneath(i'm lazy).
I like the stub shaft setup, why? when going to the track, only need to take one axle instead of 2. And in my van, it really does help torque steer with no limited slip-something else to add to my never ending list.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Personal Finance | Agencia de turismo | Mortgages | Debt Consolidation | Free Ringtones


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.

Page generated in 0.51931 seconds with 13 queries