TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Block

Engine - Block Improving strength and durability - pistons to crank

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 12-31-2004, 01:25 PM   #1
srt-4 rods  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: york, pa

My Ride: 86 glh-t
Engine: stock 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 178
Feedback: (0)
just looking at the clevite bearing catalog, and the eagle rod catalog. i see that the big end of the srt-4 (edz engine code) and the 2.2/2.5 have the same specs. meaning the srt-4 rods will fit onto a 2.2/2.5 crank. the wrist pin is a smaller dia. in the srt4 rods (.900 vs .866) so custom pistons will be needed. rod length is the same as the turbo I & II rods. anyone know anything about this ?

scot
xjjunkie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 06:06 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
Yes, in fact look HERE and follow the links for using T-II/2.5 rods in N/A 2.4L's being converted to turbo...
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 06:09 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
As far as using a 2.4L turbo rod in a 2.2/2.5, I'm not sure that any benefit would overcome the added cost...
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2005, 01:41 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 385
Feedback: (0)
srt4 rod is much stronger then a TII rod.
Turbolag87 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 11:31 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Monticello, MN 55362

My Ride: 2002 Tacoma(for now)
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,073
Feedback: (0)
have a compairson picture?
PentastarTurbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 04:19 AM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Carlisle PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,055
Feedback: (0)
http://www.bstockum.com/e10.jpg

Daniel Merrill
89acclaim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 12:17 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: york, pa

My Ride: 86 glh-t
Engine: stock 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 178
Feedback: (0)
not looking at the factory srt-4 rod, but the eagle srt-4 replacement.

scot
xjjunkie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 12:57 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbolag87
srt4 rod is much stronger then a TII rod.
Yes, and how many people have found their T-II rods to be their weakest link?
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 12:58 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PentastarTurbo
have a compairson picture?
The difference isn't in the design/shape of the rod, but the alloy used to cast them.
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:02 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis, TN

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 494
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xjjunkie
not looking at the factory srt-4 rod, but the eagle srt-4 replacement.
Are you making more than 375HP?
Casper is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:18 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Good old Wisconsin!!!!!!

My Ride: 1990 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5 obviously
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.810

Posts: 646
Feedback: (0)
SRT4 rods are have more structural integrety also, they are cracked rods, not machined like TII cars..
Raymont is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 01:46 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Collingdale, PA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 163
Feedback: (0)
wow, look at the crower rod (on the left) compared to the 2.5 rod (next to it).

http://www.bstockum.com/allrods.jpg

Looks a hell of alot beefier.
marcoze is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 03:08 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
Crower is the ultimate connecting rod.
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 04:54 PM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: york, pa

My Ride: 86 glh-t
Engine: stock 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 178
Feedback: (0)
beg to differ, oliver is the ulimate rod....


scot
xjjunkie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 11:25 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA

My Ride: '87 Omni
Engine: Dodge 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.320

Posts: 1,735
Feedback: (0)
Cracked rods to me means cintered iron.....I wouldn't go near one with a ten foot pole. Please tell me they are not cintered iron and something else that can be cracked. Detonation on something that can be cracked is a scary thought, and cap shift on rods isn't that big of a problem.....
Putter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Epson Stylus Photo Printer | Adverse Credit Remortgage | Loans | MPAA | Loans


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Page generated in 0.77773 seconds with 13 queries