 |
|
  |
 |
03-10-2005, 12:20 PM
|
#46
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
Thanks, I was 10hp off, lol! but you get the idea. Now add a few miles and Total Seal will hold the power level and the reg rings will taper off.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
03-10-2005, 01:20 PM
|
#47
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
My Ride: 99 Cummins
Engine: 5.9
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
They are great rings, but i wouldnt tear a motor apart just to replace the rings to see the difference. too many variables.
the 10hp you pick up afterwards could be because you honed the block and gave it a fresh wall to seal against, so of course they will seal better- stock would seal better after a fresh hone too. if you just throw them in without a hone, especially their file fit rings, then they wont seal as good as they should, meaning you just wasted money..
unless of course it was just honed/rebuilt not too long ago, then it may be comparable.. but then why would you want to replace the things then.?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
03-10-2005, 01:26 PM
|
#48
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Timmay2
They are great rings, but i wouldnt tear a motor apart just to replace the rings to see the difference. too many variables.
the 10hp you pick up afterwards could be because you honed the block and gave it a fresh wall to seal against, so of course they will seal better- stock would seal better after a fresh hone too. if you just throw them in without a hone, especially their file fit rings, then they wont seal as good as they should, meaning you just wasted money..
unless of course it was just honed/rebuilt not too long ago, then it may be comparable.. but then why would you want to replace the things then.?
|
  |
I agree but if your rebuilding like I am, why not!
They tested the rings as such so they had comparable mileage or wear so that way, its an even test! I think they did X amount of pulls or time, whatever so they were all equal!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
03-10-2005, 05:55 PM
|
#49
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
My Ride: 99 Cummins
Engine: 5.9
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Yep.. not arguing that, i was just stating if someone were to go pull their stock engine apart and re hone it and re ring with total seal and credit the rings for all the power.. thatd be nuts.
If its already apart and being rebuilt, might as well use the best.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-04-2005, 04:39 PM
|
#51
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Green Bay WI
My Ride: 1987 CSX
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cybermrc
I ran the gapless ring the first time I built my 2.2L. I gapped them per Total Seal's specs. Never had any oil burning issues what so ever. I checked my compression, and I was surprised to see ~180-185 psi across the board.
FWIW, I used Total Seal's regular rings the 2nd time around, and I have about 170-175 psi on all cylinders now.
On both ring styles times, I have approx. 19-20" Hg vac. at idle, and ~24-25" on decel.
|
  |
Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.
Also with the JE's too the run very quiet, well for these angine's it's also a 2.2 so I don't know how much of a help this info will be. Next car I get when it's rebuilt I'll defininatly go with Je's and Total seals again
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-04-2005, 04:49 PM
|
#52
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RSTURBO
Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.
Also with the JE's too the run very quiet, well for these angine's it's also a 2.2 so I don't know how much of a help this info will be. Next car I get when it's rebuilt I'll defininatly go with Je's and Total seals again 
|
  |
Awesome, thanks for the info, hopefully next week I can have mine running and see what they do,
BTW, what did you do about valve seals?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-05-2005, 02:05 AM
|
#53
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany
My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RSTURBO
Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.
|
  |
What final finish (stone grit) were your cylinders done at for the Total Seal rings? Was the start up with dry rings or lubed?
Last edited by John B; 06-05-2005 at 02:20 AM.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-05-2005, 02:07 AM
|
#54
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
I can't remember, its at work in the box but you get instructions on everything and you even get some British style rock candy!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-05-2005, 02:16 AM
|
#55
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany
My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbovanman
I want low 13's.
|
  |
You want low 10's; you expect low 13's...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-05-2005, 05:27 AM
|
#56
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John B
You want low 10's; you expect low 13's... 
|
  |
Thats old hat now, I am going for low to mid 12's,
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-06-2005, 08:07 AM
|
#57
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Roanoke, Va.
My Ride: GLHS Charger
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.700
|
Just curious on the mileage on the motor and any oil issues. I myself used them and will not use them again. I had a problem with it using oil. My buddy had the same thing happen and both of us are very detail oriented about motor prep. ect. We used a different machine shop as well. I put the Sealed power rings in and it hasn't used a drop since. This was about four five years ago so maybe something has changed in the oil tension ring area.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-06-2005, 01:26 PM
|
#58
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA
My Ride: '87 Omni
Engine: Dodge 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.320
|
I'm curious to how well over the overlap holds up to detonation.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-06-2005, 01:36 PM
|
#59
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome
My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
i think this was brought up when Menegon was talking about them and that they needed a special honing procedure. Warren said that above as well. With that said, I just use standard file fit rings and Im satisfied with that.
Brian
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|