TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Block

Engine - Block Improving strength and durability - pistons to crank

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 03-10-2005, 12:20 PM   #46
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Thanks, I was 10hp off, lol! but you get the idea. Now add a few miles and Total Seal will hold the power level and the reg rings will taper off.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 01:20 PM   #47
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ

My Ride: 99 Cummins
Engine: 5.9
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,094
Feedback: (4)
Images: 6
They are great rings, but i wouldnt tear a motor apart just to replace the rings to see the difference. too many variables.

the 10hp you pick up afterwards could be because you honed the block and gave it a fresh wall to seal against, so of course they will seal better- stock would seal better after a fresh hone too. if you just throw them in without a hone, especially their file fit rings, then they wont seal as good as they should, meaning you just wasted money..

unless of course it was just honed/rebuilt not too long ago, then it may be comparable.. but then why would you want to replace the things then.?
Timmay2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 01:26 PM   #48
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmay2
They are great rings, but i wouldnt tear a motor apart just to replace the rings to see the difference. too many variables.

the 10hp you pick up afterwards could be because you honed the block and gave it a fresh wall to seal against, so of course they will seal better- stock would seal better after a fresh hone too. if you just throw them in without a hone, especially their file fit rings, then they wont seal as good as they should, meaning you just wasted money..

unless of course it was just honed/rebuilt not too long ago, then it may be comparable.. but then why would you want to replace the things then.?
I agree but if your rebuilding like I am, why not!

They tested the rings as such so they had comparable mileage or wear so that way, its an even test! I think they did X amount of pulls or time, whatever so they were all equal!
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:55 PM   #49
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ

My Ride: 99 Cummins
Engine: 5.9
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 3,094
Feedback: (4)
Images: 6
Yep.. not arguing that, i was just stating if someone were to go pull their stock engine apart and re hone it and re ring with total seal and credit the rings for all the power.. thatd be nuts.

If its already apart and being rebuilt, might as well use the best.
Timmay2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2005, 05:42 PM   #50
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down by the bay, where the zim

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 76
Feedback: (0)
Was the question of top ring vs. second ring answered? I can see arguements for both.

For the top ring as gapless:
You do not need to run a second ring (unless required by racing regulations), which reduces drag and wear and tear.

For the second ring as gapless:
Reduces the ring's exposure to heat, and being able to run a low tension moly ring at the top might help seal the whole works better (for the reasons previously stated in this thread), possibly increasing performance?

Concerns:
For the top ring as gapless:
Can the Total Seal Gapless handle just as much heat as a regular ring?

For the second ring as gapless:
It is mentioned that there could be gas trapped between the rings if two sets of Total Seals Gapless are used, would a low tension moly top ring still have this issue?

Other questions:
Do you still need to run oil rings?
Do the gapless rings still benefit from a torque plated hone?

And ultimately:
Which is better, which produces more power? It was mentioned that there are specific applications that would benefit from each, but that these differences were lost in mumble land. Did anyone ever get the full story?

Thanks,
Jeff
Turbo SOB is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 04:39 PM   #51
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Green Bay WI

My Ride: 1987 CSX
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 285
Feedback: (0)
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by cybermrc
I ran the gapless ring the first time I built my 2.2L. I gapped them per Total Seal's specs. Never had any oil burning issues what so ever. I checked my compression, and I was surprised to see ~180-185 psi across the board.

FWIW, I used Total Seal's regular rings the 2nd time around, and I have about 170-175 psi on all cylinders now.

On both ring styles times, I have approx. 19-20" Hg vac. at idle, and ~24-25" on decel.

Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.

Also with the JE's too the run very quiet, well for these angine's it's also a 2.2 so I don't know how much of a help this info will be. Next car I get when it's rebuilt I'll defininatly go with Je's and Total seals again
RSTURBO is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2005, 04:49 PM   #52
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RSTURBO
Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.

Also with the JE's too the run very quiet, well for these angine's it's also a 2.2 so I don't know how much of a help this info will be. Next car I get when it's rebuilt I'll defininatly go with Je's and Total seals again
Awesome, thanks for the info, hopefully next week I can have mine running and see what they do,

BTW, what did you do about valve seals?
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 02:05 AM   #53
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany

My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 1,718
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RSTURBO
Simon I have the same Pistons and rings in my car right now. It only have 1100 Miles on te engine we did a Compression test and it came up 178-181 all across. I burn no oil at all and my HG is 19-20 and my Decel hg is also 24-27.
What final finish (stone grit) were your cylinders done at for the Total Seal rings? Was the start up with dry rings or lubed?

Last edited by John B; 06-05-2005 at 02:20 AM.
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 02:07 AM   #54
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
I can't remember, its at work in the box but you get instructions on everything and you even get some British style rock candy!
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 02:16 AM   #55
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany

My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 1,718
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by turbovanman
I want low 13's.
You want low 10's; you expect low 13's...
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2005, 05:27 AM   #56
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John B
You want low 10's; you expect low 13's...
Thats old hat now, I am going for low to mid 12's,
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 08:07 AM   #57
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Roanoke, Va.

My Ride: GLHS Charger
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.700

Posts: 751
Feedback: (0)
Just curious on the mileage on the motor and any oil issues. I myself used them and will not use them again. I had a problem with it using oil. My buddy had the same thing happen and both of us are very detail oriented about motor prep. ect. We used a different machine shop as well. I put the Sealed power rings in and it hasn't used a drop since. This was about four five years ago so maybe something has changed in the oil tension ring area.
MVaughn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 01:26 PM   #58
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA

My Ride: '87 Omni
Engine: Dodge 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.320

Posts: 1,735
Feedback: (0)
I'm curious to how well over the overlap holds up to detonation.
Putter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2005, 01:36 PM   #59
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PirateSwashbucklers.awesome

My Ride: 88 Plymouth Reliant
Engine: 2.5L T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,768
Feedback: (0)
i think this was brought up when Menegon was talking about them and that they needed a special honing procedure. Warren said that above as well. With that said, I just use standard file fit rings and Im satisfied with that.

Brian
Aries_Turbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2005, 01:55 AM   #60
 
boosting change
 
The Pope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Spokane WA

Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,457
Feedback: (1)
I asked about them at the machine shop and they mentioned they cause a failure. They hold in heat and the top ring takes the full force of each hit. The standard type seams to live longer. On detonated engines look at the top ring, you'll notice that it has shrunk smaller than the lower ring and smaller than the cylinder. My engine uses file fit rings. They are filed till they almost touch. They are total thickness the whole way, the gapless type are real thin where they overlap. Thin melts faster.

I don't know,,,,,, maybe they will work fine. But it has been a white faced bug eye'd "don't use those" at the machine shop.
The Pope is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Loans | Myspace Codes | Personals | Guitar Lessons | Bankruptcy


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.