 |
|
  |
 |
02-21-2005, 06:19 AM
|
#1
|
  |
|
block machining
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: lithuania
1/4: 0.000
|
OK, now I have one spare common block left, and Im planning to built it next season.Now local rallye guys annoying me with their confidence, telling me to consider next "very important, key procedures":
- perfect inline match machining of cranshaft necks;
- perfect main cap inline machining with block deck and cylinder bores;
- cylinder machining for perfect inline match between themselves and also angle between shaft center and rod necks line....
They are saying, I have to machine everything I can, but say nothing about torque plate. Im telling that we have a little bit different concept engines - they normaly do small japs for n/a high rew opperation. They rew 10 000 rpm!
But they are telling me, that there is no difference, I HAVE to do these mods if I want engine to go wild and alive.
What do You think about these mods above - is it that important, I mean perfectness in stroking dimensions?
Thanks
Andrius
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-25-2005, 08:55 AM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Dells in Wisconsin
My Ride: '89 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
^ ... Heh
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-25-2005, 12:19 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737
|
Actually, when they line bore they actually remove a very small amount of material from the bottom of the rod caps, which makes the journals slightly oval. Then they hone all of the journals at once so that they are perfectly rounds and lined up. Decking the block is also part of this process and it is done such that the plane of the block deck is perfectly parallel with the axis of the crank journals.
Every engine rebuilding book I have seen says that this process is definately worth while on a "seasoned" block. You only need to have it done once because a seasoned block is fairly stable. What happens is that slowly, over time the journals become misaligned and out-of-round. The process is very slow, thus the bearings have plenty on time to wear such that the crank remains properly aligned and supported. However, you then go and put new rod bearings in, which conform to the misaligned block and you then have problems. The same out-of-round principals apply to rod journals as well and not having the rods corrected is probably the reason behind a lot of spun bearings in peoples' new motors.
Basically, if you are going to go through all the effort of tearing down and having a shop go through it, why not have them do it right? Maybe I'm just weird, but I am willing to spend a little extra if it increases the chances that I won't have to do it all over again.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-25-2005, 02:00 PM
|
#9
|
  |
|
align hone
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Brunswick Maine
My Ride: 86 Turboz CS,
Engine: 2.2 T2
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by minimopar
Actually, when they line bore they actually remove a very small amount of material from the bottom of the rod caps, which makes the journals slightly oval. Then they hone all of the journals at once so that they are perfectly rounds and lined up. Decking the block is also part of this process and it is done such that the plane of the block deck is perfectly parallel with the axis of the crank journals.
Every engine rebuilding book I have seen says that this process is definately worth while on a "seasoned" block. You only need to have it done once because a seasoned block is fairly stable. What happens is that slowly, over time the journals become misaligned and out-of-round. The process is very slow, thus the bearings have plenty on time to wear such that the crank remains properly aligned and supported. However, you then go and put new rod bearings in, which conform to the misaligned block and you then have problems. The same out-of-round principals apply to rod journals as well and not having the rods corrected is probably the reason behind a lot of spun bearings in peoples' new motors.
Basically, if you are going to go through all the effort of tearing down and having a shop go through it, why not have them do it right? Maybe I'm just weird, but I am willing to spend a little extra if it increases the chances that I won't have to do it all over again.
|
  |
I think you meant they machine the main caps(you said rod caps), bolt them back onto the block and then align hone. I beleive decking simple trues up the deck surface
perpendicular to the bores. also prevents issues with the head gaskets.
Also cant the machine shop check to see/measure to determine if the block
needs the align honeing operation? I hade my block decked, bored/honed with deck plate, rods resized etc. I do agree though, if it needs it do it. How much was you machine work for the align hone? Cliff told me he doesnt see many issues for align honing on ones he has done.
Mike
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-25-2005, 02:07 PM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada
My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400
|
We could go on about this for years, lol!
My .02 cents. Check the main bearings, if there worn and there worn evenly, IE tops or bottoms then line boring isn't necessary. If you the bearings are worn to the sides or show weird patterns and the crank is checked as true then yes, get it done. Now, if you have lots of money, go for it anyhow, lol!
Get the deck squared is another great idea, mine was out a few thou.
While your at it, deburr all the casting flash, open up and port match the oil pump hole and I also made the passage to the oil filter larger. Deburr as much of the casting flash at the water jackets as humanly possible to reduce aeriting, I think thats how you spell it, basically foaming the coolant, lol, and get your engine balanced, worth every penny!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-25-2005, 09:49 PM
|
#11
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
Polish the crankcase under the bores then seal it with Glycol to promote oil return...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-26-2005, 05:06 AM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: lithuania
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by turbovanman
Now, if you have lots of money, go for it anyhow, lol!
|
  |
I live in East Europe(and thats a reason I cant translate properly all procedures), and labor costs here are very very low! Ex:
Line honning of all cylinders - 30$
Block squaring(deck line with cranck mains) - 20$
Rod necks lineing on cranck- 30$
Head shaving - 14$
Mains lineing in block - 110$
So its not that much in total. But to be honest I doubt that all of this is realy needed.Block square'ing - all it does is equals all cylinders in CR. Rod necks - it should very mislined to make impacto on operation I think, because bearings are soft, alowes a lot of flex. Only true need I see only on mains to be inline and under exactly same angle with ALL cylinders.
Rgz
Andrius
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
02-27-2005, 11:41 PM
|
#13
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Prescott, AZ
My Ride: 1985 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900
|
if costs are low, then get it ALL done!
squaring the deck is a MUST - otherwise you may not even be able to hold a headgasket.
Line hone - maybe, but I'd get it done (I DID).
Bore/hone is needed if your piston to wall clearnace is too large, or you're going to larger pistons for any reason.
Install new intermediate shaft bearings!
Rods reconditioned - do it, its worth it. After having mine done, WOW.
Head shaving - only if its not square, or has gouges or scratches.
I had it ALL done, and I'm very happy I did! Otherwise the motor would be more of a hassle then its worth.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
03-01-2005, 12:34 PM
|
#15
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
Ooops...yeah...
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|