TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine - Block

Engine - Block Improving strength and durability - pistons to crank

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 02-21-2005, 07:23 PM   #1
Anyone running 8.5 compression with 2.2L  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburgh

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 515
Feedback: (0)
Hey guys I'm ordering everything to build my motor, and I want to go with higher compression to rev up faster. I was wondering if anyone anyone is running 8.5:1 I know all about detonation, so you dont have to warn me

Thanks, Matt
glhs#064 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 07:54 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
If you get a custom cal, run a good intercooler, and higher octane gas, won't be an issue. Then again, the stock 2.2L ratio is around 8.2 so .3 wont' make much difference.

Last edited by turbovanman; 02-21-2005 at 08:11 PM.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 08:00 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburgh

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 515
Feedback: (0)
Yea, Thats what I planned on doing, I just wasnt sure why nobody that sells them gives the option to change the compression.
glhs#064 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 09:16 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minnesota

My Ride: 1985 Dodge Omni GLH
Engine: 2.2l
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.301

Posts: 563
Feedback: (0)
I stuck with stock compression, but plan on using calibration tricks to get the car to spool. (at low rpm and high load, retard ignition timing a few degrees and add some extra fuel to kick the turbine)
TheRock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 09:30 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRock
I stuck with stock compression, but plan on using calibration tricks to get the car to spool. (at low rpm and high load, retard ignition timing a few degrees and add some extra fuel to kick the turbine)
OOh fireworks with the extra fuel for spool,
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:03 PM   #6
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by glhs#064
Yea, Thats what I planned on doing, I just wasnt sure why nobody that sells them gives the option to change the compression.
The pistons? It's hard enough to get an order of pistons that work at all in our cars from the major manufactors (Wiseco, JE, etc..). The vendors that do carry those forged pistons are already having to order up large batches of custom pistons for our cars. It just wouldn't be practical to have them any more customized than that. Now you could easily contact the manufacturer of your choice, and have them make you the custom piston of your dreams, and it's not a whole lot more than the vendors charge, as I understand..
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:11 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina

My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,564
Feedback: (0)
Doesn't a 2.2 with G-head pistons and a 782 head have compression around 8.5? Maybe even a couple of tenths more?
The S is Silent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:46 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburgh

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 515
Feedback: (0)
Well I have a FM Enforcer II Head, so I guess I'll have to contact the manufacturer and have a set made. Thanks for the info guys.
glhs#064 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 12:45 AM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: North Dakota

My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser
Engine: 92 com. blk. 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 10.600

Posts: 340
Feedback: (0)
My 2.2 CR is 8.58 to1, Just be sure to tune it properly.
2.2=8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 07:18 AM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: pittsburgh

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 515
Feedback: (0)
Turbo's Unleashed is doin my cal. So I should be ok.

Matt
glhs#064 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 07:24 AM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Southgate, KY

My Ride: 1987 Shelby GLHS 189
Engine: 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.510

Posts: 5,234
Feedback: (0)
Off boost the car will like it.
glhsken is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 09:07 PM   #12
 
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal

My Ride: '86 Omni GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.230

Posts: 224
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The S is Silent
Doesn't a 2.2 with G-head pistons and a 782 head have compression around 8.5? Maybe even a couple of tenths more?
Hmm . . My TD ignorance is emerging . . . Are there different pistons for g-head motors vs swirl head motors?

Can someone please explain this for me?

__________________
Eric Shelton
'86 GLHS #422 - 13.232@106.046
2.2 TII O-ringed Common Block w/ forged JE pistons, G Head w/ studs, Adj. Cam Sprocket, RP 3 bar cal (+40's), Ported Exhaust Manifold, Turbo: 50 trim-tO4E comp. wheel/ .63 exh housing, 3" s.v./downpipe, A555, 22x8x15 ET Drags
My Website
GLHS422 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 09:12 PM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South Carolina

My Ride: 1986 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2 pseudo TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,564
Feedback: (0)
It's common for people to put a g-head on an engine with swirl head pistons to lower the compression.

The opposite is true for raising compression. 782 head on an engine with g-head pistons.

The g-heads have a slightly larger combustion chamber than the 782 head. In order to keep the compression the same when they moved to the 782 head, they used pistons with a slightly deeper dish.

Just in case nobody has passed this your way (and I can't imagine this being the case ) www.thedodgegarage.com
The S is Silent is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 09:23 PM   #14
 
Una
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bremerton, WA

My Ride: Horizon GLH-T
Engine: 2.5L Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.900

Posts: 5,138
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The S is Silent
It's common for people to put a g-head on an engine with swirl head pistons to lower the compression.

The opposite is true for raising compression. 782 head on an engine with g-head pistons.

The g-heads have a slightly larger combustion chamber than the 782 head. In order to keep the compression the same when they moved to the 782 head, they used pistons with a slightly deeper dish.

Just in case nobody has passed this your way (and I can't imagine this being the case ) www.thedodgegarage.com
Yeah, I do that on every N/A engine I get near. Swirl head and MPFI does wonders for waking up the good old HO engines.. hahah..
Una is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 09:23 PM   #15
 
Hybrid Booster
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: So Cal

My Ride: '86 Omni GLHS
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.230

Posts: 224
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The S is Silent
It's common for people to put a g-head on an engine with swirl head pistons to lower the compression.
Thanks - I knew about this, but I thought all 2.2 pistons were the same and that it was merely the difference in cyl. head combustion chamber volume that was changing the compression. I just figured that swirl-head motors have a certain compression and g-head motors have a different compression. But it sounds like the pistons were also different . . .

Does JE make two different kinds of forged pistons for the 2.2 motor?

Quote:
In order to keep the compression the same when they moved to the 782 head, they used pistons with a slightly deeper dish.
Well, that pretty much answers my other question! So all 2.2 motors came from the factory with the same compression ratio, huh?!? I guess I need to freshen up my TD-trivia knowledge!

Quote:
Just in case nobody has passed this your way (and I can't imagine this being the case ) www.thedodgegarage.com
LOL . . . Gary who??? . . .

Thanks for the clarification!

__________________
Eric Shelton
'86 GLHS #422 - 13.232@106.046
2.2 TII O-ringed Common Block w/ forged JE pistons, G Head w/ studs, Adj. Cam Sprocket, RP 3 bar cal (+40's), Ported Exhaust Manifold, Turbo: 50 trim-tO4E comp. wheel/ .63 exh housing, 3" s.v./downpipe, A555, 22x8x15 ET Drags
My Website
GLHS422 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Mobile Phones | Loans | Gas Suppliers | MPAA | Bad Credit Mortgages


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Page generated in 0.46785 seconds with 13 queries