 |
  |
 |
04-09-2005, 10:14 AM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Who's broken a CB?
|
|
NO Democracy!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Nun-yah, Maine
1/4: 0.000
|
There's a little bit of confusion on another thread about CB's and which ones to look for.
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/sho...805#post648805
Some are saying a "C" casting has an advantage being cast in Mexico where the T-III blocks are said to be superior(less core shift and better material used). Some have said they cracked one of these "c" blocks, too. All of the blocks I have seen/heard of cracking in the back by the freeze plugs were '89 blocks. I am wondering if there's a certain year "c" block that we should look for ('90+)
So... anyone that has cracked a CB from making alot of power, please tell so we can get a collective result to see if there is truth to the later "c" blocks (90+) being better, or not. Also, note 2.2/2.5
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-09-2005, 11:05 AM
|
#2
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada
My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I'm curious about that too.. Also what HP level did the 89 blocks crack at?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-09-2005, 12:11 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
It should be TII blocks or just any C blocks since mopar used them up in any of the late model cars including na's. And add what type of transmission and equal or unequal driveshafts. I'm getting the suspicion that the problem is stress from the half shaft bracket on equal length axles.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-10-2005, 02:42 PM
|
#6
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: SOHC 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I have a smaller "C" stamp but just below the waterpump and there is another "C" on the back near the serial number? The casting date is 11-22-90. My motor is also just getting back from the machine shop, I will also take lots of pictures
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-11-2005, 08:33 PM
|
#7
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
My Ride: '88 Shelby Z TII
Engine: 2.2 TII
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.284
|
I found a "C" block in a '89 TI 'Baron...to bad the guy wants to keep the car
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-11-2005, 09:18 PM
|
#8
|
  |
|
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis
My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
U Wrench It St. Louis. 4 Daytonas right now. One has 2.5 C block. A Blue 92 has perfect gfx and 140mph speedo. I don't remember the other 2. The block is 135+ core u pull. all automatics. There's a couple sets of rear disks cars, who stole all the dohc 16 valve heads?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-18-2005, 01:36 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle
My Ride: 92 Duster
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.700
|
i find it hard to believe people are breaking blocks with pure power. Maybe cylinders are deforming in the highest power cars, but not blocks just cracking from power. 4 cyl bmW block was good for 15,000 rpm and 1000 hp just filling up some extra coolant passages to the head and running a slightly smaller bore. That was their stock street block that they were also using in their 86-87 turbo indy cars that actually were making 1400hp during qualifying laps when fuel was unlimited.
Now cold weather and equal half shaft.......I see a problem there.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-23-2005, 05:12 PM
|
#12
|
  |
|
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada
My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
 Quote:
|
Originally Posted by supercrackerbox
I found out today that the 2.5 that came in my 88 Z is one of the 'C' blocks. It also had LW rods with pressed pins, and the oil return tube didn't have the ridge towards the top like every other one I've ever seen, so I suspect that it may have been an NA motor converted for turbo. I didn't think to check the casting date, I'll do that before I take it to the scrap yard.
|
  |
I had a similar problem with my 89. The rebuilders (way before I got the car) put LW rods in the 89 2.5 block. NOT a good idea in a T2 car.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|