Re; 210 ft/lbs torque or 170?

[COASTAL SHADOW]

I've read contrary articles regarding the torque output of the 91 shadows 2.5t as to callibration of fuel mix and advance. The difference supposedly is between the standard or auto trans.

[COASTAL SHADOW]

Sorry, didn't actually ask a question. Can anyone say for sure if the 210 came in the standard or auto?

[NAJ]

Info from 1990 Chrysler Service Manual
2.2L T4 210 Lbs.-Ft. @ 2400 RPM
(The window sticker says 210 @ 3200 RPM)
2.5L T1 180 Lbs.-Ft. @ 2000 RPM

[bhazard]

Window sticker for my 92 auto T-1 says 210 lbft. at 2400 rpm. It all depends on how much boost is running and whether or not its limited at certain rpms.

[COASTAL SHADOW]

Just going back through the pioneers works I see that the calibrations were 2.5 and specific to the trans.

[crazymadbastard]

The 2.5 t1 in 92 got a High torque cal with the 568 tranny, so 210+ sounds right for a stick equipted car.

[Shel-Game]

The ONLY difference was the boost schedule. The autos limited boost below ~3k rpm to ~7psi or so. If you put a hi-torq computer into an auto car, you get 210ft-lbs. Hell, if you put a grainger on a AT computer you'd get the same 210ft-lbs. The hi-torq cal is really nothing special at all...

[dcshadow]

that torque difference occured in 91 the sticks got the faster boost schedule and the 210 ft/lbs of torque at 2100rpm

[COASTAL SHADOW]

THAT, I believe, actually answers my question. I was trying to determine if 91 was the first year that this came stock with a t-1, and if it was auto or stick.

[venom800tt]

91' was the first year to have high torque on 2.5 T1 and it is only available on manual trans from factory, no auto at all.