 |
  |
 |
05-10-2008, 11:56 PM
|
#1
|
  |
|
MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Mo' valves, mo' boost
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeastern MA
My Ride: Daytona ES
Engine: 2.4L DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
What would happen if I ran a 3-bar cal with a 2-bar sensor and/or vice versa? I'm trying to do some investigating. I've got my Daytona running on a stock TII calibration with the stock MAP sensor and it idles fine. When I switch to my 3-bar calibration and the 3-bar sensor, it runs rough, dies suddenly every so often, and throws a code 13. Both the calibration and the sensor are new.
__________________
Jon J.
1989 Daytona ES 2.4L - MPH (and, turns out, MPG too!!)
2003 Neon SXT - MPG... yeah just MPG
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-12-2008, 12:53 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: goodrich MI
My Ride: 85 laser
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.720
|
Turn the fuel pressure down since the calibrations have to cover a wide variety of engine combo's from stock to fully built and ported they tend to err on the rich side.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-12-2008, 01:08 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Resident piston cracker
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 9.800
|
Do not run it or turn the fuel pressure down, something is way wrong. I had this issue. The engine ran strong with the 2bar sensor even though it called for a 3bar. Whenever I plugged the 3bar sensor in, the engine would run like total sh!t, then I would put on the 2bar and it would run "right". So right that I did not suspect I would melt a piston, but I did.

call the vendor unless you enjoy fixing the car way too much. (I don't)
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-12-2008, 02:23 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Mo' valves, mo' boost
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeastern MA
My Ride: Daytona ES
Engine: 2.4L DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Ok, thanks for the heads up guys. I'm definitely glad I didn't try experimenting with it now! I definitely don't want to ruin a brand new engine.
I'm trying to get in touch with the vendor. I won't say who because I've never had any problems at all with this particular vendor and I don't want to give them a bad name. I just need to find out if there's something else I need to change other than the MAP sensor when I switch computers.
__________________
Jon J.
1989 Daytona ES 2.4L - MPH (and, turns out, MPG too!!)
2003 Neon SXT - MPG... yeah just MPG
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 03:27 AM
|
#6
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ettrick, WI (Hicktropolis)
My Ride: 86 SC, 94 Duster
Engine: 2.2 TI, 3.0L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Don't 3-bar cals require +40% injectors?
Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 03:37 AM
|
#7
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ettrick, WI (Hicktropolis)
My Ride: 86 SC, 94 Duster
Engine: 2.2 TI, 3.0L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Sorry, double post. Damn connection gremlins.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 08:35 AM
|
#9
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Boostaholic
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: goodrich MI
My Ride: 85 laser
Engine: 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.720
|
So you ran a 2 bar on a 3 bar cal and you wonder why it blew up ?
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 09:33 AM
|
#10
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Mo' valves, mo' boost
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeastern MA
My Ride: Daytona ES
Engine: 2.4L DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I have SRT Stage 1 injectors, which are 577cc (works out to roughly 55lb/hr). This is on a 2.4L. Also, I've only been able to idle the car because I still haven't put axles in it yet to take it for a test run. So I don't know how either calibration acts while driving. I know that the 3-bar that I have won't even stay running long enough anyway.
__________________
Jon J.
1989 Daytona ES 2.4L - MPH (and, turns out, MPG too!!)
2003 Neon SXT - MPG... yeah just MPG
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 02:42 PM
|
#13
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Resident piston cracker
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
My Ride: 92gtc vert
Engine: 2.5 8v
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 9.800
|
No, I know why it blew up. Silly!
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-13-2008, 05:03 PM
|
#14
|
  |
|
Re: MAP Sensors vs SMEC cal... what would happen
|
|
Mo' valves, mo' boost
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeastern MA
My Ride: Daytona ES
Engine: 2.4L DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
Ok, I talked to the vendor and they said that I could try the 3-bar cal with the 2-bar MAP just for quick diagnosis, but certainly not for a long time and definitely not while making a 1/4 mile pass.  That way, I can see if it's a bad MAP or a bad cal. Thanks everybody.
__________________
Jon J.
1989 Daytona ES 2.4L - MPH (and, turns out, MPG too!!)
2003 Neon SXT - MPG... yeah just MPG
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|