TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine Management, Fuel, Spark, EGTs, and Air/Fuel Ratios

Engine Management, Fuel, Spark, EGTs, and Air/Fuel Ratios This forum includes modification, tuning, repair, replacement, identification and restoration of all components mentioned above including SMEC, SBEC, Logic Modules, aftermarket engine management, etc. Nitrous oxide posts go in here. This is the place

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 01-18-2005, 09:10 AM   #1
Question Super 60 turbo kit and turbo computers?????  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweden

My Ride: -92 Daytona IROC
Engine: 2,5 turbo I
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 179
Feedback: (0)
I drive an -92 Daytona IROC with 2,5 litres engine.
I just wonder if anyone does know if this parts from Moparperformance does fit my car.

SUPER 60 TURBO KIT

*P4529980 Super 60 Turbo Kit
Turbo computer

*P5249017 1989 2.5L Turbo I ATX
or
*P5249018 1989 2.5L Turbo I MTX

Anyone know the diffrence between ATX and MTX ?
ERACE is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 09:37 AM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Whitmore Lake, Michigan

My Ride: Titan & '89 C/S AGS
Engine: 2.5L T1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.873

Posts: 1,408
Feedback: (5)
Nope, none of them will work on your car without major re-wiring.

ATX or MTX is manual trans or automatic. The only major difference is idle control.
Shel-Game is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 02:28 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737

Posts: 1,950
Feedback: (0)
The Super 60 calibration is pretty out-dated. You are much better off with a custom cal from one of our vendors. TU will try to tune the cal to your specs.
minimopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2005, 05:46 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dearborn, Michigan

My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.130

Posts: 458
Feedback: (0)
I appreciate the plug, still have to finish the SBEC II cals though.

I'm going to get to them, hang in there guys!


Quote:
Originally Posted by minimopar
The Super 60 calibration is pretty out-dated. You are much better off with a custom cal from one of our vendors. TU will try to tune the cal to your specs.
MRBOOST is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 11:33 AM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737

Posts: 1,950
Feedback: (0)
Ahh...forgot about the SBEC II. Wow...good luck with that.
minimopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 11:47 AM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRBOOST
I appreciate the plug, still have to finish the SBEC II cals though.

I'm going to get to them, hang in there guys!
SBEC II? what the heck is that or am I opening a can of worms,
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:29 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dearborn, Michigan

My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.130

Posts: 458
Feedback: (0)
It's not a big deal, 92+up are SBEC II, uses a different PROM, and has 3D maps. Doesn't work with earlier body modules either.

I've looked at them already to see what was going on, and I don't think they'll be hell to figure out or anything, just need the time.



Quote:
Originally Posted by turbovanman
SBEC II? what the heck is that or am I opening a can of worms,
MRBOOST is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 12:43 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRBOOST
It's not a big deal, 92+up are SBEC II, uses a different PROM, and has 3D maps. Doesn't work with earlier body modules either.

I've looked at them already to see what was going on, and I don't think they'll be hell to figure out or anything, just need the time.
So from a laymans point of view, what does that mean performance wise, better running, smoother, more power?
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 03:31 PM   #9
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737

Posts: 1,950
Feedback: (0)
Well, if you are trying to do a cal: more confusing.
minimopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 04:13 PM   #10
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria (EUROPE)

My Ride: '92 Daytona Iroc
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 537
Feedback: (0)
Keep us informed Paul about the SBEC-II cals.
Definitely need a 3bar one
Austrian Dodge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2005, 05:47 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dearborn, Michigan

My Ride: 87 Daytona Shelby Z
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 12.130

Posts: 458
Feedback: (0)
To the last 3 posts...

Turbovanman: "So from a laymans point of view, what does that mean performance wise, better running, smoother, more power?"
The 3D maps are more precise and give many more tuning points within a table, so they can be tuned closer then a cal with 2D maps, I would have to say they should run a little better the fuel control is very precise, but I'm sure as with most things that the driving force behind them at the factory was emissions.

Minimopar:"Well, if you are trying to do a cal: more confusing."
Hell yes! Probably take a lot longer to tune as well.

Austriandodge:"Keep us informed Paul about the SBEC-II cals.
Definitely need a 3bar one"
Will do, going to be a while on these though, I have more work done on the T-III cals for 90-91 so I should finish those first. There will be 2BAR first, and 3BAR will follow shortly after. From the response I'm getting on the GLHS 3BAR cals, I'm really looking forward to releasing them.
MRBOOST is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 03:35 AM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 38
Feedback: (0)
I did a bit of searching, and found a super 60 computer out in Az., at a dealership, for $188. The Mopar book said that it (the s 60 comp.) would open the wastegate up to 11 lbs. of boost instead of 8, and that it was a direct fit placement. On the other hand, I was informed that I could not just simply "slap on an intercooler and go", but that I would need a Shelby computer to intercool it. Is this true? Any info or feedback will be appreciated.
Bladerunner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 07:53 AM   #13
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Whitmore Lake, Michigan

My Ride: Titan & '89 C/S AGS
Engine: 2.5L T1
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.873

Posts: 1,408
Feedback: (5)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladerunner
I did a bit of searching, and found a super 60 computer out in Az., at a dealership, for $188. The Mopar book said that it (the s 60 comp.) would open the wastegate up to 11 lbs. of boost instead of 8, and that it was a direct fit placement. On the other hand, I was informed that I could not just simply "slap on an intercooler and go", but that I would need a Shelby computer to intercool it. Is this true? Any info or feedback will be appreciated.
You can "slap" on an intercooler and go. People do it all the time. But, you will need a computer with the Charge Temp sensor "turned on" in order for the computer to fully compensate for the reduced charge temps the intercooler will provide. Any of the T2 computers will have the charge temp enabled. Most of the cal vendors can supply a custom cal based on just about anything and have the charge temp enabled.
Shel-Game is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 11:18 AM   #14
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Spokane, WA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,476
Feedback: (0)
actually the charge temp sensor does very little. it is mostly just an early warning device that pulls timing if the charge temp exceeds a certain value. use a good intercooler and it will never even get used.
xrattiracer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2005, 12:44 PM   #15
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1986 Plymouth Horizo
Engine: 2.2 Turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 11.705

Posts: 2,548
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by xrattiracer
actually the charge temp sensor does very little. it is mostly just an early warning device that pulls timing if the charge temp exceeds a certain value. use a good intercooler and it will never even get used.
Input from the Charge temp sensor also allows the computer to adjust a/f mixture based on temp. For instance, if you have added a bigger intercooler, or if the outside temperature is way cold.. the computer will compensate somewhat with fuel.. even at full throttle.
contraption22 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Cheap Loan | vBulletin Hosting | Mortgages | Loans | Bad Credit Loan


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM.

Page generated in 0.57438 seconds with 13 queries