TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine Management, Fuel, Spark, EGTs, and Air/Fuel Ratios

Engine Management, Fuel, Spark, EGTs, and Air/Fuel Ratios This forum includes modification, tuning, repair, replacement, identification and restoration of all components mentioned above including SMEC, SBEC, Logic Modules, aftermarket engine management, etc. Nitrous oxide posts go in here. This is the place

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 08-15-2005, 09:38 AM   #31
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey

My Ride: 86 SC & 98 Neon
1/4: 11.300

Posts: 1,337
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTurbo
I'm wondering if the stock fuel return line isn't flowing enough and causing rail pressures to rise too high in boost. Would upgrading the return line ease the load on the fuel pump?
A small return line should not have this effect at boost.
At boost, most of the fuel is going into the engine and not being returned to the tank.
At idle most is being returned to the tank.
DblTrbl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 06:30 PM   #32
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Minnesota

My Ride: 1992 Dodge Daytona
Engine: 2.5l I-4 super 60
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,206
Feedback: (0)
Well, a way to find out if the return line is too restrictive is to see what the wideband says if you unplug the vacuum line from the regulator. If the mixture leans out under full boost, with the vac line off, I don't think the return line would be the problem.

I had a problem of pegging my wideband richer than 10:1. Probably way richer. So, right now I have a check valve to prevent the regulator from seeing boost pressure. It just bleeds the pressure off, but keeps the vacuum sealed. I am right around 10.5:1 WOT right now. But I have a stock hi-torque ECU with +40 injectors and adjustable regulator. I Think my fuel pressure is somewhere around 23 PSI static. And I run rich with no pressure to the regulator.
phantomrt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2005, 11:11 PM   #33
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saskatchewan

My Ride: 1987 Duster
Engine: 2.2 T1 convert
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 232
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrboVan
Can you explain that a little further?
I am running big feed and a small return. (always have)
ya i guess i cant speak for everyone but stock my return line is smaller than the feed line,

and in theory fuel is used by the engine therefore there will never be more fuel returning to the tank than there is flowing to the rail.
thedanielm is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2005, 04:46 PM   #34
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: County Rd 1320

My Ride: 1993 Dakota
Engine: 3.9
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,634
Feedback: (1)
Explains my L body dilemma. I have 90 psi at the rail with a Walbro and the Accufab adjusted all the way out to all the way in.
So if I run 5/16 or 3/8 supply then "theoretically" I should be able to get some adjustment? I was thinking of running 3/8 supply and using my supply as a return. I understand 3/8 is overkill (at least on my car) but I haven't found a continuous piece of 5/16 line.
ACR Turtle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 08:38 PM   #35
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: County Rd 1320

My Ride: 1993 Dakota
Engine: 3.9
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,634
Feedback: (1)
I took the easy route. I ran 3/8 aluminum line as a return. AN fittings out of the regulator and BAM! 55 psi at the rail, then a little tweaking just right. I may take the left over 3/8 and run a supply line later on.
ACR Turtle is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 10:57 PM   #36
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany

My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 1,699
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Y2kTurtle
I took the easy route. I ran 3/8 aluminum line as a return. AN fittings out of the regulator and BAM! 55 psi at the rail, then a little tweaking just right. I may take the left over 3/8 and run a supply line later on.
How much pressure does the return line have to hold? Is line strength an issue like with the supply line?
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 11:26 PM   #37
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John B
How much pressure does the return line have to hold? Is line strength an issue like with the supply line?
The return line should be able to hold maximum pump pressure in case the reg fails and you get full pressure going back to the tank. Don't kid yourself and say it won't happen, it does!
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 01:08 AM   #38
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany

My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 1,699
Feedback: (0)
Is there anything between the regulator and the tank? In other words, if I try to blow through the return line should I get a lot of resistance?
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 01:45 AM   #39
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Abbotsford, BC, Canada

My Ride: 1989 Turbo Caravan
Engine: 2.5L 8V Sohc
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.400

Posts: 14,727
Feedback: (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by John B
Is there anything between the regulator and the tank? In other words, if I try to blow through the return line should I get a lot of resistance?

No, you should be able to blow thru it but it might have a check valve on the end or something similiar.
turbovanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2005, 03:06 AM   #40
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mannheim, Germany

My Ride: '91 Shadow Vert
Engine: 2.5 turbo
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.880

Posts: 1,699
Feedback: (0)
Hmmm, mine is REALLY hard to blow through, almost ruptured myself. I figured it was the weight of the residual fuel in the line, but now I wonder if it's blocked somehow. I guess I need to take the gas cap off and blow out the line with high pressure air. Thanks Simon.
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 08:48 PM   #41
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: calgary AB

My Ride: 89 omni & 90 T1 shad
Engine: 2.5L HX-35 w/alcohol
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,270
Feedback: (0)
im am soon going to be running a second stock turbo pump and a second stock set of lines in my van and Y them together at the rail. thats how im making sure im not going to run out of fuel. safe? i guess we'll se how well i do it!
turbo minivan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2005, 10:04 PM   #42
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Terrace B.C. Canada

My Ride: 90 vnt daytona
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 92
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by iTurbo

Would this explain my overly rich wideband O2 curve that my Shelby Lancer has? It dynoed 196WHP/242WTQ on a Dynojet with 14 psi boost. It was using stock calibration, 804s, 3" exhaust. The wideband O2 curve dropped off the scale rich as soon as it went into boost all the way to redline. Same thing with my brother's TII '89 GTS which is similarly modded and has the Walbro 255 ltr/hr pump as well. I'm wondering if the stock fuel return line isn't flowing enough and causing rail pressures to rise too high in boost. Would upgrading the return line ease the load on the fuel pump?
Yes, I figured this out with my afr, I had 52# injectors on a stock cal and wanted to go down to 28# , I could not go any lower thatn 37# with the 255 ltr/hr pump.So I went with the stock fuel pump and can go all the way down to 2#. I assume that the stock pump is about 130ltrs/hr So basically if i went with a larger return line I should be fine
Cracked is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 12:33 AM   #43
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey

My Ride: 86 SC & 98 Neon
1/4: 11.300

Posts: 1,337
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cracked
Yes, I figured this out with my afr, I had 52# injectors on a stock cal and wanted to go down to 28# , I could not go any lower thatn 37# with the 255 ltr/hr pump.So I went with the stock fuel pump and can go all the way down to 2#. I assume that the stock pump is about 130ltrs/hr So basically if i went with a larger return line I should be fine
I believe it has alot to do with the regulator rather than the fuel line. I have found that the regulators with the welded on retrn nipple flow less than the ones with the screw on fitting.

I'll bet if you hook the return line directly to the fuel feed line, with no regulator in between, you would get very low backpressure. Might be an interesting test.

Carl
DblTrbl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 01:03 AM   #44
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake & Seattle

My Ride: 94 Spirit
Engine: 3.0
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.987

Posts: 6,710
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cracked
Yes, I figured this out with my afr, I had 52# injectors on a stock cal and wanted to go down to 28# , I could not go any lower thatn 37# with the 255 ltr/hr pump.So I went with the stock fuel pump and can go all the way down to 2#. I assume that the stock pump is about 130ltrs/hr So basically if i went with a larger return line I should be fine
Put a bigger return line.

Just like a 3" exhaust helps even when you have a small turbo, the big line will help.

Im going to run into the same problem as you pretty soon.

Still, no one answered my question about some of the old carbed cars having 3/8 feed line. At that point, you can just start using your old feed line for return.

I guess autozone also loans out pipe benders to do your own.
Ondonti is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2005, 07:23 AM   #45
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Iowa City, IA

My Ride: '87 Omni
Engine: Dodge 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.320

Posts: 1,735
Feedback: (0)
I converted my Omni from carb to turbo, it was equipped with 5/16" lines when carbed.
Putter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads