TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Engine Management, Fuel, Spark, EGTs, and Air/Fuel Ratios > Alcohol / Methanol / Water Injection

Alcohol / Methanol / Water Injection Discussion about alternative injection systems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 04-14-2007, 03:56 PM   #1
Chemical intercooling as opposed to adding a FMIC? (T1 mitsu)  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 191
Feedback: (0)
I've been reading and this alky/water injection thing seems really flippin neato

I've read a lot on here and I THINK I would like to give it a try instead of spending about the same amount of money(though probably more) aquiring a different radiator/intercooler/airbox/hoses/fittings/clamps/etc etc.

An overall goal for my car is to have a quick car in the 12-13 second 1/4mi range on DOT tires that is basically a wolf in sheep's clothing. Adding an intercooler of course makes it look much more potent in the eyes of ricers... it's fairly reasonable to think "he doesn't have an intercooler, it's got no real potential" since you can't -see- the intercooler in plain sight.

For the time being I want to run up to 14psi on my little mitsu... of course it gets crazy hot and my car is pushing 140k miles, so I don't want to do that without some form of intercooling.

In my own logic it seems that a Devilsown progressive kit would be the wisest choice since I don't have an air-to-air IC to take car of the low-mid boost levels so it would be good to have it come on gradually from like 6psi on.

I've read a few pages that explain alcohol/water injection in general, but I've got some other questions:

If you have the stock computer cal taking care of your fuel, wouldn't alcohol injection screw up the A/F ratio? Or does it take so little that it's more-or-less unaffected(unless you're purposely using it as your fuel of course)? Or would that call for straight water injection so it only cools and doesn't act as a fuel?

Would it be possible to only have a controller provide enough alky for cooling up until 14.7psi and then dump much more to take over fueling as well(after zenered MAP of course)?
flatlander757 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 11:15 PM   #2
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oklahoma City

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 33
Feedback: (0)
yes, it can affect your a/f ratios. How much depends on what size nozzle you run. The bigger you run the more cooling you have. So its a catch 22.

We don't currenty have a way to do something like that.
Devilsown is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2007, 08:27 PM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 191
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilsown
yes, it can affect your a/f ratios. How much depends on what size nozzle you run. The bigger you run the more cooling you have. So its a catch 22.

We don't currenty have a way to do something like that.

I was actually thinking to myself to devise a way to make that work... Here goes:

What if you run a basic injection system with one of the smallest size nozzles available starting at say 8 or 10 psi...

Then use a pressure switch to open the circuit for the progressive controller to spray a second nozzle from 14psi on up...?

The basic system would be spraying the entire time, but at lower boost levels it will be enough to do a bit and as the boost climbs it will become negligible so as long as the progressive is tuned right you should be fine, no?

flatlander757 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2007, 08:29 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lorimor, IA

My Ride: 95 CTD, 89 Spirit TD
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 672
Feedback: (1)
In theory that would work. But if your initial use of the alky injection is to cool the charge, then a water/meth mix will be more effective and less likely to screw with the air/fuel ratio. The investment of the pressure switch and nozzle would be the same whether you used gas or alky. You may want to think of going with the cold start(s) and pressure switch with gas and just use the progressive kit for cooling. These are just my thoughts, as I have no experience with the cold starts, just the progressive kit.
whistlin' is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2007, 08:40 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 191
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by whistlin'
In theory that would work. But if your initial use of the alky injection is to cool the charge, then a water/meth mix will be more effective and less likely to screw with the air/fuel ratio. The investment of the pressure switch and nozzle would be the same whether you used gas or alky. You may want to think of going with the cold start(s) and pressure switch with gas and just use the progressive kit for cooling. These are just my thoughts, as I have no experience with the cold starts, just the progressive kit.
Alright thanks! I actually just happened upon a free FMIC that a DSM guy isn't going to be using so I'm much more inclined to do the work associated w/ intercooling my mitsu
flatlander757 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Mortgage | Cheap Car Insurance | Credit Card Consolidation | Mobile Phones | Credit Cards


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0

Page generated in 0.26406 seconds with 13 queries