 |
  |
 |
04-15-2008, 09:42 AM
|
#1
|
  |
|
Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
My Ride: '85 LeBaron
Engine: I4/2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.710
|
Has anyone tried the Allison Transynd in their A413, or any auto trans for that matter? After doing quite a bit of research on synthetic ATF, I decided to try the Transynd and just recently drained and filled my A413 with the stuff. Now it heats up more than I like. It used to get to around 120 and stay, but now it shoots up to 160 and climbs up more on the highway.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-15-2008, 11:30 AM
|
#2
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Volga SD
My Ride: 84 Chrysler Laser XE
Engine: 2.2 Turbo II
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I'm pretty sure it's made by Castrol if that helps at all.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-15-2008, 12:09 PM
|
#3
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BCM
My Ride: 2.4 Turbo Spirit
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
What used to be 120 and 160? The trans? wheres the temp sensor? If your keeping it below 180 then your fine
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-15-2008, 12:51 PM
|
#4
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
My Ride: '85 LeBaron
Engine: I4/2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.710
|
My trans temp sensor sits inline before the cooler. It climbs past 160F during my 25 mile trip to work, but I'm worried about a longer cruise. It may go higher, and I'm afraid to find out.
I must explain myself here. Why did I go with TranSynd? It's compatable with Dexron III and it's synthetic. I wanted a synthetic for long trips where I'll be towing a trailer. I used Dexron III instead of ATF+3 and had zero problems for two years. But I also know that Dexron (and maybe TranSynd?) has a lower friction coefficient than ATF+3 or ATF+4. However, since I had no problems with Dexron III, I decided to go with TranSynd.
It has been said that ATF+4 has a seal incompatibility issue with the older trans. My transaxle is out of a '89 Plymouth T1 and was rebuilt with a new Mopar A413 overhaul kit. I'm not positive which seals it provided nor do I know if they are compatible with ATF+4.
Has anyone ran ATF+4 in the older A413 and seen these seal problems? If not, then I'll remove the TranSynd and put in ATF+4 as ATF+3 isn't available anymore. I could put Dexron III back in, but I should use what the factory recommended.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-15-2008, 03:20 PM
|
#5
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BCM
My Ride: 2.4 Turbo Spirit
Engine: 2.4 DOHC
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I know turbovanman(Simon) has been running synthetic dexron for awhile w/o issues, he said to save some money and just use that.
The drag racers are using Tractor hydraulic fluid instead of Type F which many used to use.
Well I guess you still cant link to the other site 
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-16-2008, 06:25 AM
|
#6
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Old School Hot Rodder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newport News, Va
My Ride: 1985 LeBaron Vert
Engine: MOPAR 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I have been using MOPAR ATF+4 in my A413 since I built it 3 or 4 years ago with no problems. It seems to be a synthetic equivilant of type F fluid as far as friction qualities go. Dexron and it's updates were created by GM originally as both a synthetic oil and to "soften" the shift feel. Years ago Hot Rod Magazine had an article comparing the friction vs. clamping force. Dexron started off with less friction and built up, type F started with more initial friction. The end result at full apply was the same. Type F and ATF+4 give a "crisper" shift feel.
__________________
Bill Vose
Old School Hot Rodder
"Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional"
1985 LeBaron Mark Cross convertible 2.2L TurboII
1986 Turismo 2.2 (race car)
1986 LeBaron convertible 2.2L TBI (dead)
1986 F350 Crew Cab DRW
1989 J body coupe 2.5L TurboI (parts car)
1989 J body convertible 2.5L TurboI (wrecked in front, granddaughter's car)
1993 Grand Caravan 3.3L
1995 Lincoln Continental (project car)
http://www.oldschoolhotrodder.com
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-16-2008, 09:06 AM
|
#7
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Swanton, OH
My Ride: 88 T-bird/92 Shadow
Engine: 2.3t/2.5t
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 15.263
|
Not meaning to go off topic or anything but, are there any downsides to using Type F over +4? Its like half the price. I heard it gives a firmer shift as well.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
04-16-2008, 10:45 AM
|
#8
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
My Ride: '85 LeBaron
Engine: I4/2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.710
|
Update time.
A friend of mine who does plenty of transmission work told me transmissions usually rises to the same temperature as the engine as both are connected together. As long as the transmission matches engine temperature, there's no problem. Yesterday I rodded the car plenty on the way home (and I shan't tell you how fast  ) just to see what the temperature climbs to. It went no higher than the engine's temp (190F) and when I let off, both the trans & engine temps drop together to 165F. Very interesting!
I am used to the slow temp rise of Dexron III, and I guess I freaked out watching the trans temp rise faster than expected with TranSynd. But maybe that's a good thing. I read that TranSynd has the same friction dynamic coefficient as ATF+3, but it's "dual viscosity", meaning it retains the same viscosity at hot & cold temperatures. The new ATF+4 from Mopar and Valvoline is the same. I know of two tricks used to bring the trans temp up quickly to reduce wear. One is to use a radiator trans cooler and the other is a cooler bypass valve in the valve body (Dodge Neon A413s have this feature). Maybe TranSynd & ATF+4 resolved this problem with their dual viscosity properties so neither the radiator cooler or cooler bypass are needed? If so, that makes things a lot easier!
I'll watch more and report in later.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-15-2008, 08:22 AM
|
#9
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Niagara Falls, ON.
My Ride: '88 Plymouth Voyager
Engine: 3.0 V6
Induct: N/A
1/4: 0.000
|
I'm using Walmart TDH UTF in an A670 (A413 in V6 bellhousing) , since August last year. Made from high VI group 3 base stocks, so damn close to synth as far as properties go. Works great.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
05-17-2008, 09:29 PM
|
#10
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver WA
My Ride: 87&88 baron 89 mini
Engine: 2.2 & 2.5
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000
|
I have a turbo mini with a 3 speed auto non lock up converter will this stuff be ok in my type of tranny and will this stuff get along with dex/merc if mixed. I have to change fluid/filter because my tranny's governer is not shifting back into 1st at stoplights. I plan on using seafoam and then new filter/fluids. Do I have to drain the whole tranny and torque converter. If so, how would I drain the tc.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
  |
 |
06-25-2008, 10:17 AM
|
#12
|
  |
|
Re: Allison Transynd
|
|
Naturally Aspirated
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boise, Idaho
My Ride: '85 LeBaron
Engine: I4/2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.710
|
Final Update:
After driving with the Allison Transynd in my A413 for several months, I have definite proof it's not compatible. Here's the data in the order of modification:
Overall gear ratio: 3.22
Fluid: Dexron III
MPG: 25
Trans temp on freeway: 130
Overall gear ratio: 3.02
Fluid: Transynd
MPG: 18
Trans temp on freeway: 190
Overall gear ratio: 2.6
Fluid: Transynd
MPG: 22
Trans temp on freeway: 190
Overall gear ratio: 3.02
Fluid: Dexron III
MPG: 25 
Trans temp on freeway: 140
Note how the temperature is still slightly higher after I flushed out the Transynd and put Dexron III back in. There must be a small amount remaining. I'll flush it again for good measure.
I don't have exact knowledge as to what caused this drop in MPG (performance too!) and increased heat, but I feel the torque converter was the culprit as it may have been incompatible with the Transynd. Maybe Transynd requires a different TC design?
Well, this was a failed experiment, but what's life without adventure? A good friend of mine who raced NHRA Comp Eliminator said that in experiments like this, 90% is research & development. Only 10% of the parts, fluids, & procedures tested are actually used to race.
I hope everyone can get some useful information from this. I have more MPG experiments lined up. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
|
 |
  |
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» Quick Nav |
|
» Quick Tech |
|
» Market Place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|