TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.
 

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Suspension, Brakes, Tires, and Wheels

Suspension, Brakes, Tires, and Wheels This forum includes modification, repair, replacement, identification and restoration of the above parts and how to tune them for better traction and handling. Also includes wheel bearings and hubs, wheel studs and nuts, wheel spacers, and other rela

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools

Old 06-23-2003, 03:53 PM   #1
Independant Rear Suspension  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Elmhurst, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby Charger
Engine: 2.2L Turbo I
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 142
Feedback: (0)
Has anyone tried taking the rear suspension of a pt crusier, neon, or new neons, and mounting it on a L-bodie, or anyother? I planed on doing this before and thought it would be cool. Just wondering kids.
ShelbySean is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2003, 07:51 PM   #2
Re: Independant Rear Suspension  
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: calgary, alberta, canada

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 292
Feedback: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by ShelbySean
Has anyone tried taking the rear suspension of a pt crusier, neon, or new neons, and mounting it on a L-bodie, or anyother? I planed on doing this before and thought it would be cool. Just wondering kids.
as soon as i get some time i am going to get the rear suspension from a neon at the wrecker, but it is a lot of fabbing/bracing involved.
finboy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2003, 08:20 AM   #3
 
GLH_TC 16V
Guest
 


Posts: n/a
I was looking into this as well, but that is a future project for me. Priority is getting the Omni up and running right now. I was looking into the possibility of using a Talbot Horizon rear suspension, but no one seems to know if it had an IRS or not. I've e-mail a couple of people on eBay that were selling the car, but so far no replies.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2003, 12:11 PM   #4
 
Boostaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Isle De Muerta (Perryopolis PA)

My Ride: The Black Pearl
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,269
Feedback: (0)
Yes, I have been looking at it as well. The major problem that I have found is that the neon is a fair amount wider in the rear. Something on the order of 4-7 inches (I don't recall it has been a while) So either the fenders on the charger would have to be widened, or the IRS made more narrow.... either way, not the easiest task. ~~Heath
Kid Doc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2003, 03:26 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Salem, Virginia

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 218
Feedback: (0)
Maybe the track width would be better suited for a Daytona instead? From there maybe adpatation would be easier? Just a thought...
BadAndy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2003, 05:58 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.TurboDodge.com

My Ride: 1991 Daytona Shelby
Engine: 2.5L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.000

Posts: 2,857
Feedback: (0)
the neon, shadow, lancer, daytona, etc. have the same track width, with very similar frame locations. very feasible.

the only hard part is making everything square.
Frank is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2003, 11:53 AM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Salem, Virginia

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 218
Feedback: (0)
Well.....I knew about track width being the same however I was actually thinking about how the body flairs outward quite a bit......in looking at a Daytona it would seem that you could gain some track width in the rear.....being as we are actually talking about a different setup altogether.
BadAndy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2003, 04:05 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: York, Maine

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,089
Feedback: (0)
IRS - the one item that my Aries wagon (and other fwd mopars) lack that newer cars have!!!

i too wish we could swap over to IRS on our cars. on a smooth flat road, a beam axle is just as good as independent suspension. its when you go around a corner [hard] or hit a bump that puts the wheels at odd angles to each other - results in rear wheel/axle hop and the back end sliding!!!

too bad someone hasn't created an IRS kit for our cars. A modified beam axle would be fine. keep the trailing arm part, remove the central part of the beam and put in cradle setup or diagonal arms going up. there is a reinforced section going accross that might support an IRS setup. as long as the system uses coil springs in the back and not struts like a neon
(so i can use hd springs, air bags, etc)
capev86 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2003, 01:03 AM   #9
 
T1OmniIC
Guest
 


Posts: n/a
VW folks seem to do fine with the semi-IRS that they have. The rear axle actually looks very similar to the ones in the L-Bodies.

I guess that IRS would be a good thing though, but i just don't know if the benefit would outweigh the cost and time.

-Aston
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

» Quick Nav
- Home
- Classifieds
- Timeslips
- Gallery
- Vendors
-- Directory
- Tech Articles
- Donate
Sponsors
remove ads

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1
Xbox Mod Chip | Car Loan | Car Loan | Gas Suppliers | Homes for Sale


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Page generated in 0.36083 seconds with 13 queries