TurboDodge.com MarketPlace Shelby Registry Contact Us

Advertisement - Remove these ads today by clicking here.

Go Back   TurboDodge.Com - Turbo Dodge forum for Turbo Mopars, Shelbys, Daytona, SRT-4, PT Cruiser, Omni and more! > Turbo Dodge Technical Chat > Suspension, Brakes, Tires, and Wheels

Suspension, Brakes, Tires, and Wheels This forum includes modification, repair, replacement, identification and restoration of the above parts and how to tune them for better traction and handling. Also includes wheel bearings and hubs, wheel studs and nuts, wheel spacers, and other rela

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-19-2005, 08:34 AM   #1
Premature rear brake lockup?  
TD Extreme User!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gillette, Wyoming

My Ride: Dodge Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2L Turbo III
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,512
Feedback: (1)
I recently had to get on the brakes pretty hard in my Shelby Lancer after a brief tango with a Camaro Z28. While braking, I noticed that the rear was locking up prematurely and getting really squirrely (slight fishtailing). Kinda freaked me out because I didn't think it would do this and it wasn't anticipated.

Why would this be happening? My SL has a complete 11" brake setup from a '91 Lebaron GTC. They are the same brakes that are on my Spirit R/T. I have the entire brake system from that car including the prop valve and 24mm master cylinder. It has fairly new Raybestos PG+ pads, and resurfaced rotors as well.

Perhaps the rear end of my car was a little too light? I had about 1/4 of gas and the car was pretty much empty including the trunk/hatch area. Could this problem be helped by swapping a different prop valve in or should I look elsewhere? I'd really like to retain control of the car if/when I need to use my brakes in an emergency situation..
__________________
Jeremy Mitchell
86 Omni GLH Turbo
87 Shelby Lancer #127
91 Spirit R/T
iTurbo is offline  
Reply With Quote Share on facebook

Sponsored Links - Subscribe to remove this ad.
Old 05-19-2005, 10:24 AM   #2
 
TD Extreme User!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Gillette, Wyoming

My Ride: Dodge Spirit R/T
Engine: 2.2L Turbo III
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 4,512
Feedback: (1)
I just put the rear of my SL on jackstands and removed the wheels to have a look at things. The tires are good Kumho 711s that are Z rated and have plenty of tread left and are wearing evenly. The wheel bearings are fairly new and seem good. The brake pads and rotors are wearing evenly. Brake lines seem good too.

The only 'problem' I could find was with the rear rotors. They seem to be worn evenly but I think they might be out of spec (too thin). The rotors had what appeared to be some pitting too. Could this be the problem? If the rotors are unable to dissapate heat properly, will it cause premature lockup?
__________________
Jeremy Mitchell
86 Omni GLH Turbo
87 Shelby Lancer #127
91 Spirit R/T
iTurbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 11:36 AM   #3
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada

My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,650
Feedback: (0)
Images: 5
My 88 did that last year in a race.. I have the non-vented rotors and I feel fairly certian they were just overheating... which apparently causes brake fade.
Turbo Charger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 07:20 PM   #4
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago, IL

My Ride: 1987 Shelby CSX #694
Engine: 1987 2.2L
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 14.737

Posts: 1,950
Feedback: (0)
My 87 CSX has always behaved that way. Too much brake in the back. Using higher quality pads up front seems to help.
minimopar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 08:13 PM   #5
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada

My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,650
Feedback: (0)
Images: 5
Interesting.. well I may find out soon. I've got some nice crossdrilled rotors on the way since FWDP had them on sale last week.
Turbo Charger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 09:18 PM   #6
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Quincy, Michigan

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,626
Feedback: (0)
Same here on my Shelby Z. Last year I would "powerslide" it into work all the time, since I have to make a right hand turn into work, and the gravel right at the entrance combined with a little bit of brake would always cause the rear end to slide out. And this is at like 15 mph.
lametec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2005, 10:49 PM   #7
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: AUBURN, MA

My Ride: 1987 Daytona ShelbyZ
Engine: 2.2 T2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,185
Feedback: (5)
brake fade and lock up are not one and the same. your fronts will overheat(fade) way before rears but you will lose pedal feel with the brake fade it will feel mushy to no exsistent. i had the rear lock up situation happen in my race prepped shadow(i.e gutted road car) i use adjustable prop valves to straighten that out. are you using the brake lines they way they are supposed to be? meaning cross diagonal braking. l/f and r/r brake together and r/f and l/r brake together?
overboostperformance is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 04:29 PM   #8
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada

My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,650
Feedback: (0)
Images: 5
Well.. I found out my problem. One of the front shoes was wore down to the rivets. Odd considering the other 3 front shoes had about 50% wear left. I think I'm gonna bleed them just to be sure both are working up to par. Pistons are fine.
Turbo Charger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 05:18 PM   #9
dirt in lines  
TD Hardcore User!
 
looneytuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Louis

My Ride: 85 GTS, 3 87 GTS, 89
Engine: 2.2
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 2,717
Feedback: (5)
Images: 5
you could have dirt in line preventing the release of pressure. Make sure the pins are lubed too. I had the dirt problem on the rear on 96 Neon sport.
looneytuner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 05:32 PM   #10
 
Level 1 Supporter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada

My Ride: 93' Turbo Duster
Engine: 2.5L T2/S60
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 13.675

Posts: 522
Feedback: (0)
Images: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo Charger
Well.. I found out my problem. One of the front shoes was wore down to the rivets. Odd considering the other 3 front shoes had about 50% wear left. I think I'm gonna bleed them just to be sure both are working up to par. Pistons are fine.
Shoes on a disc brake? Do you mean pads? And if they are wearing like that the caliper is sticking on the slider pins.


You guys need an adjustable proportioning valve for you rear brakes it would let you dail them in to meet your needs....
d_snook6 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 05:43 PM   #11
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NB, Canada

My Ride: 88,89,90 Shelby's
Engine: T2's and a VNT
Induct: Turbo
1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,650
Feedback: (0)
Images: 5
Pads sorry.

I actually jacked up my car and checked the tires after using the new brakes for a while. It was obvious nothing was sticking.
Turbo Charger is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2005, 06:17 PM   #12
 
Naturally Aspirated
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: wisconsin rapids, WI

1/4: 0.000

Posts: 1,699
Feedback: (2)
if one pad is heavily worn vs' the rest, you have sticking parts (caliper slides, caliper piston, brake hose internal failure) are all classis causes for this problem.
22dodge is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Page generated in 0.23095 seconds with 11 queries