Look up Cliff's 2.5 Tlll wagon he built. It was a pretty nasty torque monster set up. But it was a awsome looking set up too.
Andre' Parker said:Look up Cliff's 2.5 Tlll wagon he built. It was a pretty nasty torque monster set up. But it was a awsome looking set up too.
scott said:from my personal experience you'd be better off sticking w/ a 2.2 when using the r/t head (depending on piston design and compression ratio of course) because the timing curves in the cals are not completely nailed down and you could run into problems. You may also want to try posting in the r/t section...there are probably some people in there that don't check this area that can help you out.
That's if you're going to use the stock 2.2 R/T cal. FWD-P cal pulls a lot more timing under boost than the stocker, so it would probably work well with a 2.5. Larry (4sfed4) and I discussed this, as he has done ALOT of datalogging of their cal. He felt the FWD-P timing curve was really conservative on the 2.2. The timing curve should be about right for my 2.5 TIII, or at least I'm comfortable with it anyway. I would NOT run more than 15 psi on a stock 2.2 R/T cal and 2.5 bottom end though.scott said:from my personal experience you'd be better off sticking w/ a 2.2 when using the r/t head (depending on piston design and compression ratio of course) because the timing curves in the cals are not completely nailed down and you could run into problems. You may also want to try posting in the r/t section...there are probably some people in there that don't check this area that can help you out.
Keep the R/T wiring and computer and splice in the body harness.88-16V-Lebaron said:What is better. Going with my RT wiring and rewire my 88 and get a new computer calibrated OR Stick with my 88 wiring, put a distributor on the side and get my 88 electronics calibrated for a 16v