Are you saying that you need to shim the PT lifters farther to work with a Taft cam? Do the stock lifters need to be shimmed to work with a Taft cam?
... if not, then I don't understand John.
... if not, then I don't understand John.
John B said:I have discovered much to my dismay that I cannot use the PT lifters with my Taft cam. The total shimming required causes the lifter's upper piston sleeve to extend past the top of the lifter bore. That means that it will spew oil like Saudi Arabia. So, how do I get the lifter caps off so that I can swap the PT tops into the old lifter bottoms? I've tried prying them off but no success. Any ideas?![]()
Yes, the Taft S1 is a regrind and has to be shimmed .046" with stock lifters. The PT's are .160" shorter already, so we're looking at .200" shimming which, unfortunately, brings the lifter up so high out of the bore that it will spew oil from the side. :bang head Any ideas on how to get these things apart?puppet said:Are you saying that you need to shim the PT lifters farther to work with a Taft cam? Do the stock lifters need to be shimmed to work with a Taft cam?
... if not, then I don't understand John.
pics? I've never seen this unless the "shim" was too wide and it didn't seat to the bottom of the lifter bore. Did you add more shim to make up for a smaller cam center diameter? You can only lift them to match stock height. The seal ring is pressed, you would have to get new ones and the tool to crimp them.John B said:I have discovered much to my dismay that I cannot use the PT lifters with my Taft cam. The total shimming required causes the lifter's upper piston sleeve to extend past the top of the lifter bore. That means that it will spew oil like Saudi Arabia. So, how do I get the lifter caps off so that I can swap the PT tops into the old lifter bottoms? I've tried prying them off but no success. Any ideas?![]()
Oops, didn't read far enough! Say,,,,, did you consider using lash caps to shim the valve end?John B said:Yes, the Taft S1 is a regrind and has to be shimmed .046" with stock lifters. The PT's are .160" shorter already, so we're looking at .200" shimming which, unfortunately, brings the lifter up so high out of the bore that it will spew oil from the side. :bang head Any ideas on how to get these things apart?
depends on the caps too, the set I got from Fearra fit fine.mock_glh said:Lash caps are definitely the ticket. You get better rocker angle and the adjusters don't stick up. You may have to widen the valve slot on the rocker slightly so the caps slide freely.![]()
I did not know this.John B said:Yes, the Taft S1 is a regrind and has to be shimmed .046" with stock lifters.
How is it better? I figured stock geometry was best? How does it help with the rocker tilted toward the adjuster?mock_glh said:Lash caps are definitely the ticket. You get better rocker angle and the adjusters don't stick up. You may have to widen the valve slot on the rocker slightly so the caps slide freely.![]()
I hear you change the lift ratio between lifted at the lash or lifted at the valve. Ford 2.3 guys have been doing this for many years to change ratio's. The base circle is allot smaller. At a machine shop they would leave the valve stems long to match it up (if room exists for that much). Lifting the lash adjuster increases lift and lifting the valve decreases lift through ratio. How much on a 2.2? Don't knowJohn B said:How is it better? I figured stock geometry was best? How does it help with the rocker tilted toward the adjuster?
just try the lash caps first, FM sells them. Use just the washers with the PT units and no spacer, then run a lash cap. Lift is effected because the lobe hits in a different place on the follower, but it isn't changed allot, it is minor. Our ratio is real high anyway, around 1.8:1, I don't think I would try to get closer to a 2:1 ratio on the follower with a raised lifter anyway. BMW uses a rocker that slides and tilts to completely change valve timing and lift with one cam with one set of lobes. I wouldn't stress it, I would try the lash caps and see.John B said:Oops, I misread. You say I need to raise the lifter in relation to the stem. So, I need a tall lifter of some kind, and a lower valve stem, right? I'm unclear how that changes lift. I can see how the cam timing will be advanced and retarded by changing geometry, and I can see how valve side loading will be changed , but why is lift affected?