Joined
·
12,279 Posts
ok there's a couple of issues here
first when fitted with a225 tire a daytona is equipped with 225 50 15'
not sixty series tires ..FIFTY SERIES
you won't get the 60 on the car
not enough space
'80's mustang 5.0's used a 225 60 15..
they ARE SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER IN DIAMETER
tire diameter compassion ... www.tacomaworld.com/tirecalc?tires=195-50r15-225-50r15
and , sorry daytonas don't 'handle" they have decent ride quality but they don't
I had an 86 turbo z , after four cars with 225 50 15 I was getting tired of the ride quality
so I went to a 215 60 15 for the increased sidewall height
they just barely fit
on a dodge fwd car like ours the passenger side wheel is mounted slightly forwards of the driver's side wheel
this means the tire is slightly closer to the front edge of the wheel well opening
-if your car isn't bent somehow this is how cryco built it
reason I presume - it resists rolling off the crown of the road if the passenger wheelbase is slightly longer
anyways.. on both my 86 turbo z and an 87 shelby z I had those 215's on
the passenger front wheel just barely touched the edge of the plastic nose where it bends and mounts to the wheel well lip
it never hit hard enough to rub the paint off or even mark the paint.. but it did touch
there is no way you'll ever get a 225 60 on there..
oh and the ride quality was much improved with the 215 60 15's in -place of the o-e 225 50 15's
handling was completely unaffected because as stated..no handling capacity to start with
handling capacity
a shelby charger is capable of turning onto a side street at 50 mph
a daytona will instead reverse ends and go into whatever is on the side of the road at that same corner BACKWARDS
first when fitted with a225 tire a daytona is equipped with 225 50 15'
not sixty series tires ..FIFTY SERIES
you won't get the 60 on the car
not enough space
'80's mustang 5.0's used a 225 60 15..
they ARE SUBSTANTIALLY LARGER IN DIAMETER
tire diameter compassion ... www.tacomaworld.com/tirecalc?tires=195-50r15-225-50r15
and , sorry daytonas don't 'handle" they have decent ride quality but they don't
I had an 86 turbo z , after four cars with 225 50 15 I was getting tired of the ride quality
so I went to a 215 60 15 for the increased sidewall height
they just barely fit
on a dodge fwd car like ours the passenger side wheel is mounted slightly forwards of the driver's side wheel
this means the tire is slightly closer to the front edge of the wheel well opening
-if your car isn't bent somehow this is how cryco built it
reason I presume - it resists rolling off the crown of the road if the passenger wheelbase is slightly longer
anyways.. on both my 86 turbo z and an 87 shelby z I had those 215's on
the passenger front wheel just barely touched the edge of the plastic nose where it bends and mounts to the wheel well lip
it never hit hard enough to rub the paint off or even mark the paint.. but it did touch
there is no way you'll ever get a 225 60 on there..
oh and the ride quality was much improved with the 215 60 15's in -place of the o-e 225 50 15's
handling was completely unaffected because as stated..no handling capacity to start with
handling capacity
a shelby charger is capable of turning onto a side street at 50 mph
a daytona will instead reverse ends and go into whatever is on the side of the road at that same corner BACKWARDS